Of course, this leaves out two or three possibilities. If someone briefed him on the story or if someone 'in Belichick's camp' fed information to Wickersham, he wouldn't need to read the column, would he? I believe this angle is the most likely one - maybe Belichick just doesn't give a rat's ass about anything that the media writes about him, good or bad. I can't recall Belichick ever preemptively reacting to a news story, so this would be consistent with past behavior.Belichick says he hasn't read the ESPN article
— Dan Shaughnessy (@Dan_Shaughnessy) January 8, 2018
Polygraphs explode across New England.
I can't wait for Shank to regurgitate all of this on 98.5 The Sports Hub tomorrow morning...
UPDATE AT 2:25 PM - You know what just occurred to me today? I was just watching Felger & Mazz, which sealed it for me. Since this story came out on Friday, how many of you were caught up in it to some degree? I mean, ignore for now whether Wickersham's story is 100% right, 100% bullshit or somewhere in between. You know how some people describe pro wrestling as 'a soap opera for rednecks'? Don't these occasional Patriots stories feel that way to you as it does to me, that this is all a huge soap opera?
3 comments:
Belichick was given info on the piece before the conference call - he got the bullet points but hadn't read the whole article. Shank is basically just being Shank again.
And you are shocked by this fraud saying this?
Not at all, Jason, not at all!
Post a Comment