tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post4643583844067481061..comments2024-03-27T21:22:03.495-04:00Comments on Dan Shaughnessy Watch: Shank the Sham and His PhariseesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-42843266876201710212009-03-26T22:19:00.000-04:002009-03-26T22:19:00.000-04:00CHB's television appearances result from pleading....CHB's television appearances result from pleading. Shaughnessy needs alternate venues for his voice, face, and commentary. With The Globe nearing extinction for its print edition and finding no pot 'o gold from its on-line version, CHB ought to take up pottery...or something.Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12775107449004277179noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-9980738778004846992009-03-26T09:08:00.000-04:002009-03-26T09:08:00.000-04:00What bugs me the most is that Shank is considered ...What bugs me the most is that Shank is considered the "voice" of Boston sports on national outlets like ESPN...probably because he hates Boston sports fans and thinks they're stupid.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-20303270252974212062009-03-26T09:01:00.000-04:002009-03-26T09:01:00.000-04:00OB,"A columnist's job is not to be a fan ..."True....OB,<BR/><BR/>"A columnist's job is not to be a fan ..."<BR/><BR/>True.<BR/><BR/><BR/>But why should a columnist be allowed to instigate friction, manipulate information, humiliate other beings, and propagate paranoia?<BR/><BR/>Are the (*)uck$ that important to the CHB?<BR/><BR/>The Shank chose to deal with the devil hoping to trade in his shadowy inferiority complex by promoting for the boss-man. Why shouldn’t we hold him accountable for wasting our time?<BR/><BR/>We “ain’t” stupid man.<BR/><BR/><BR/>“Rare indeed is the news story that has been broken without someone with an agenda getting a big mouth.”<BR/><BR/>True again OB.<BR/><BR/>gAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-84238927603982943012009-03-26T08:25:00.000-04:002009-03-26T08:25:00.000-04:00Jerry G - thanks for the snippet!What's best is th...Jerry G - thanks for the snippet!<BR/><BR/>What's best is that you've now insulated yourself from further criticism from the board's foremost (sorry, I meant <I>only</I>) defender of Shank on the following point:<BR/><BR/><I>Never bother with a reader who claims disagreement with a writer is the result of an intent to intentionally (tick) him off.</I><BR/><BR/>While it's unclear as to exactly <I>why</I> such claims should not be bothered with, I'll offer my reason - it's next to impossible to refute the bloody obvious.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for taking that one off the table, OB!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-30164121127949241002009-03-26T07:54:00.000-04:002009-03-26T07:54:00.000-04:00Although columnists are supposed to offer their ow...Although columnists are supposed to offer their own opinions, I think CHB should stand for cold hearted bastard. He should be ashamed. Poor maligned Dan. What BS!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com