tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post4051514993015709161..comments2024-03-27T21:22:03.495-04:00Comments on Dan Shaughnessy Watch: More MatsuzakaUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-42134897786236677482007-03-07T14:57:00.000-05:002007-03-07T14:57:00.000-05:00My favorite Shank-ism is the annual...They have re...My favorite Shank-ism is the annual...They have red clam-chowder, we have white clam-chowder, they have 28 titles, our park has 29 toilets...<BR/>Can we count recycled story lines as plagarism?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-48893936363585442272007-02-25T19:07:00.000-05:002007-02-25T19:07:00.000-05:00While I'll admit the constant following around Mat...While I'll admit the constant following around Matsuzaka is a bit extreme, it isn't like Shank is helping the cause by writing another article about him. Or by commenting, yet again, on the slew of reporters. Total waste of print space.<BR/><BR/>As for yesterday's piece, Ian Browne at redsox.com and Rob Bradford at the Eagle Tribune wrote better articles about Josh Beckett a few weeks ago, so Shank is late on the draw once again. It's also a joke that Shank's declaring him "the forgotten man" when he was the one who hyped the Clemens comparisons last winter after the trade went through and was the first to write a snide, mean-spirited column when Beckett struggled. (Shocker!)<BR/><BR/>The last sentence is what really irks me though, because it could be the most potentially damaging. If Joshua has another bad year, I'm going to blame it all on Shank for jinxing him in February.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com