tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post173578393133090331..comments2024-03-27T21:22:03.495-04:00Comments on Dan Shaughnessy Watch: The Height of LazinessUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-72595369204856394682008-03-11T19:59:00.000-04:002008-03-11T19:59:00.000-04:00Christ, I want to scream this from the mountaintop...Christ, I want to scream this from the mountaintops. SHANK USED A THIRD OF HIS COLUMN SPACE FOR A SINGLE, UNINTERRUPTED QUOTATION. Where is he using any of his discretion as a columnist to provide the relevant points? How is this brave? If he wanted to quote Epstein so extensively, he should have posted it in a blog. It in no way is good writing or good journalism. Joe Sullivan is going to get an angry email for this terrible piece of writing.dbvaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16313968008498094004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-31663031509213527282008-03-11T16:46:00.000-04:002008-03-11T16:46:00.000-04:00and Shank mails yet another one in.....how "Boston...and Shank mails yet another one in.....how "Boston Globe" of him...lazy hackAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-73289790085848300222008-03-11T12:09:00.000-04:002008-03-11T12:09:00.000-04:00You mean, the old Shank is back after a hiatus as ...You mean, <EM>the old Shank is back after a hiatus as reasonably good writer Shank?</EM><BR/><BR/>SAY IT AIN'T SO, SHANK!Monkeesfanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14522953722006761283noreply@blogger.com