tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post113810741523125174..comments2024-03-27T21:22:03.495-04:00Comments on Dan Shaughnessy Watch: Two for TuesdayUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-1138148368157636842006-01-24T19:19:00.000-05:002006-01-24T19:19:00.000-05:00Where are all of "Bruce's" friends coming to the d...Where are all of "Bruce's" friends coming to the defense of Dan? It seems like he's the only one who has ever written a dessenting opinion on this site, and everyone else loves the work you do to point how the CBH's goofy mistakes. Keep it up, Chief. You're performing an important public service.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-1138119752851093902006-01-24T11:22:00.000-05:002006-01-24T11:22:00.000-05:00Whoop-de-whoop, Danny boy. If it's of such "precio...Whoop-de-whoop, Danny boy. If it's of such "precious little interest" then why write about it at all? Not to mention that the "angle" as you call it was the same taken by every columnist in sports.mike_b1https://www.blogger.com/profile/03887169120483500989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17263668.post-1138118954916526092006-01-24T11:09:00.000-05:002006-01-24T11:09:00.000-05:00Wow, the irrationality that seems to flow from the...Wow, the irrationality that seems to flow from the venom is astounding. A columnist finds an angle about a game that is of prescious little interest and that merits sarcasm? And the comment about the snide brief is even worse -- you can't deny there was considerable anticipation of a Theo Returns news conference? Just when it appears this can't become more petty and insipid...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com